學報論文審查流程
一、來稿收件後：
1. 來稿若不符本刊編輯體例，由編輯委員會先行退回，請其修正後再議。
2. 編委會確認符合當期主題，不合者退稿，符合者送審查。
3. 博士生的投稿論文，先請系上老師初審，篩選過後，再進行外審作業。
二、推舉審查人選：
發函詢問學報編輯委員。
三、決定審查人選後，寄發稿件：
審查期間以一個月為原則。
四、審查截止，整體審查意見，意見結果有以下3種：
1. 可刊登
2. 修改後可刊登
3. 不可刊登
五、審查結果的處理原則
請參閱附件資料。簡言之有分成以下2種情況
1. 符合刊登，將審查意見表告知作者供其參考以增修，流程進入步驟六。
2. 不符合刊登，發函退回，並在原稿件後附上審查意見表，流程結束。
六、收回作者增修後之定稿，若缺少形式、格式則通知作者補齊。
七、學報工作人員電腦編輯、校對、排版。
八、定稿。
The Journal of History, NCCU Manuscript Review Process
1. All manuscripts will first be vetted by the Editorial Committee:
1-1. If a manuscript does not comply with the Style Guide, the Editorial Committee will reject it
1-2. If a manuscript is considered to be on a topic suitable for publication in the Journal, the Editorial Committee will recommend it for external review.
1-3. Manuscripts submitted by doctoral candidates will be first reviewed and screened by faculty of the History Department; those considered qualified will be recommended for external review.
2. External Review:
2-1. External reviewers will be nominated by the Editorial Board members.
2.2.A manuscriptrecommended for external review will be sent to at least two external reviewers for evaluation. The identities of both the author and the reviewers are kept anonymous and strictly confidential.
2.3.External review will normally be completed within one month.
3. Result of External Review: external reviewers will recommend a manuscript for one of the following:
3-1. Accepted for publication
3-2. Accepted for publication after revision
3-3. Rejected
4. After the external review is completed, the Editorial Committee will notify the author(s) of a manuscript one of the following:
4-1. Acceptance letter: with external reviewers’ comments for further revision, and procedures to submit the revised manuscript.
4-2. Rejection letter: with external reviewers’ comments.
